Thanks for reading, I appreciate the legal references in the ‘food adventures‘ section are obscure but it’s just a bit of nerdy fun on my part – no w*nky-ness intended.

Jurisdiction Type of cuisine
Outcomes 1: Unanimous Verdict: Go with friends this weekend.
2: Majority Verdict: Solid, visit if you’re in the area.
3: Jury’s still out: Average to decent, menu potential for a second visit.
4: Hung Jury: Average, nothing particularly special.
5: Case dismissed: One and done.
Ratio decidendi One-line summary (ok maybe two or three line summary).
Salient feature(s) Dishes I would order, if you do visit.
Scope of discovery Dishes that have been sampled to reach a view
Obiter Dicta Any other random tidbits of info that may (or may not) be relevant i.e. licence to ramble.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s